top of page
Search

Where does our water come from?

  • Writer: WaterResearch Bhutan
    WaterResearch Bhutan
  • 4 days ago
  • 11 min read

by Water Research Bhutan, 08 Apr 2026 waterresearchbhutan@gmail.com


How much do we know where does water in Bhutan rivers, streams and lakes come from? This article reviews recent research conducted in eastern Bhutan titled ‘Sources and pathways of spring flow and climate change effects in the Dungju Ri & Yude Ri catchments, Bhutan Himalaya’ which identified that 70 percentage of water in streams were from the precipitation. Does this apply across all Bhutan Himalayas from mountainous north to the southern foothills? Thus, this article was aimed to translate key finding of the study and discusses its relevance and implications to Bhutan’s water resource management explained in plain language with the aim to reach to grassroots level water resources managers and policy makers alike.


This question is crucial because it will shape how Bhutan allocates its resources to manage essential water supplies. Beyond satisfying the public's and environment's fundamental water needs, ambitious projects like establishing energy-intensive industries such as AI data centers and crypto mining, will demand substantial water use. Long-standing sectors driving GDP growth, including hydropower, agriculture, and tourism, also rely heavily on Bhutan's water resources. If Bhutan aims to become a superpower through these developments, we must confront tough questions about missing elements in our water management strategy. The process should begin by asking a simple yet vital principle: where does our water originate? Answering this will help identify the most effective ways to manage our water sources.  

In the face of extreme climate events, adapting to periods of excess water also presents a serious challenge for Bhutan’s water resource management. According to the IPCC (2013), rising global temperatures are predicted to destabilise the Himalayan region by accelerating glacier retreat and thawing permafrost. This will contribute to more frequent landslides and rockfalls, while increased precipitation is expected to intensify runoff and shorten the gap between extreme flooding events in the Ganga and Brahmaputra basins including all river systems in Bhutan. These changes not only heighten the immediate risk of disasters such as Glacial Lake Outburst Floods but also create long-term instability in water availability for communities across the region.

While rain, ice, and snow are key drivers of river flow in the Himalayas—sustaining agriculture, hydropower, and ecosystems—our knowledge of how these elements contribute and vary over time remains limited. The region’s remoteness, restricted data sharing between countries, and insufficient understanding of water storage in steep landscapes hinder progress. As highlighted by Panwar (2020), a lack of long-term local data further complicates reliable predictions about recharge and water quality. Therefore, it is crucial for Bhutan to prioritise closing these data gaps within available resources to support effective water management.

Currently in Bhutan, a springshed management concept seems to be taken up as a ‘silver bullet’ to mitigate drying water sources which were mostly the spring water. Numerous sites across Bhutan were being identified as ‘recharge zones’, digging up trenches (infiltration pits) with the hope that all the water collected in those pits will feed into their streams/springs thus reviving the water sources. Further, too many shallow freshwater ‘lakes’ are also being revived from ‘drying’ mainly through removing weed growth and sediment deposits without much attention to overall catchment dynamics and almost limited scientific evidence on how those lakes are linked with subsurface flows. A specialist hydrologist is not required to connect water pockets in the catchment. What’s needed is clear technical guidance and dedicated stakeholder commitment to monitor water levels, quality, and ecology over few year years, enabling more informed decisions.  An easy to collect data for such water source management can include: (1) gauging surface water level or bore water level (2) soil logs or test pits (3) site environmental history (4) precipitation records (5) monitor stress indicators in those catchments, and (6) any change in catchment that is impacting various components of site’s water balance. In summary as Panwar (2020) proposed the development and management plan for springs and streams in the Himalayas should include the following prerequisites: (i) quantification of recharge and discharge parameters (ii) quantification of the evolution of recharge area over time (iii) future predictive modelling of spring recharge area.

Tshewang (PhD scholar at Edith Cowan University) reported that though the springshed development approach has proven to be promising to rejuvenate springs in some Himalayan catchments, the major challenge lies in the accurate identification of the recharge areas. Due to the complexity of mountainous terrain, particularly, the groundwater flow system feeding springs is poorly understood, which makes the springshed approach difficult to scale up over larger areas. Thus, information on water sources of spring flow (such as groundwater, snowmelt, rainwater and soil water) and their pathways (local or regional) is urgently needed for an in-depth understanding of inner working of mountain aquifers system.

Tshewang and his team has applied the latest hydrogeochemical techniques in 2023-2024 to investigate springs and other source waters at various elevations at Yude Ri and Dungju Ri catchments, under Trashigang. In such hydrological research, tracers act like ‘scientific breadcrumbs’ that allow researchers to track the invisible journey of water as it moves through the environment. These markers can be natural tracers, such as unique ‘fingerprints’ of oxygen and hydrogen atoms already found in rain or snow, or artificial tracers, like safe, bright fluorescent dyes injected directly into the ground to see where they re-emerge. By measuring these substances in mountain springs or rivers, scientists can pinpoint whether the water originally came from melting glaciers, seasonal snow, or deep underground reservoirs. They also use these tools to calculate ‘water age’ determining how many years or even decades the water has been stored in the mountain's rocky interior before reaching a community's tap. Such "detective work" is essential for managing water resources, especially in regions like the Himalayas where understanding how different sources mix is the only way to predict future water availability.

The results from the study by Tshewang’s team pointed out that Spring flows primarily relied on precipitation (approximately 70 percentage from both direct precipitation and soil water), making them very sensitive to changes in precipitation. Significant contributions of shallow groundwater also indicated the vulnerability of spring flows to decreased snowfall relative to rainfall and the earlier onset of snowmelt, particularly for those located in the snow-rain transition zone (~2500 m). Such studies indicate that Bhutan priority should be to capture as much as possible the water that come in the form of precipitation. Numerous examples including nature-based solutions and engineered storage could be a short-term to long-term solutions but in long-term exploring more resilient mitigation options are critical to ensure water security.

Nevertheless, the main takeaway from this article is that every solution should rely on data gathered through scientific methods. The research by Tshewang and team is just one example; similar hydrogeological studies need to be the basis of decision making in terms of water management for all types of water resources explorations which in long-term can be costly to mitigate errors. Some key examples of effective water resource management can address challenges and opportunities related to:

  1. Springshed management without proper robust data on linkage with recharge zone and the discharge zone. Proper identification of the recharge areas is crucial for the protection and implementation of springshed development strategies. Just assuming headwater regions acting as a recharging area in highly diverse geological setting like Bhutan Himalayas makes success rate of reviving drying streams very challenging,

  2. Extraction of groundwater sources with limited hydrogeological information. Where does the bore draw water from and what are risks and opportunities? Damage and risk of contamination to groundwater can be costly and near impossible to remediate any damage. Or worse, what happens if we have been draining too much water and suddenly the systems the aquifer is exposed to air which they would trigger complex chemical reactions which often leads to increasing water acidity and then leaching toxic heavy metals (example Arsenic) which are common issues in Indian plains neighbouring Bhutan foothills. For instance, what groundwater management plan has been implemented for the newly established production wells installed a year ago in the centre of the Samtse industrial zone? and,

  3. Sustainability of numerous mini-hydro power plants planned based on limited hydrogeological data or how do we mitigate hydrological risk to hydropower stations - as limitations was laid bare from major risk of floods to hydropower dams in 2025. Similarly, when developing key infrastructure near major bodies of water, it is essential to conduct thorough health and safety risk assessments, particularly hydrogeological studies. This approach could help reduce the number of bridges that are overrun by rising rivers during every monsoon season!


The article is published based on personal experiences and observations by a group of water researchers from Bhutan www.waterresearchbhutan.org 

 

The article was also published in the National Newspaper of Bhutan (Kuensel) on 08 April 2026 Search result for: Where does our water come from?

substantial water use. Long-

standing sectors driving GDP

growth, including hydropower,

agriculture, and tourism, also

rely heavily on Bhutan’s water

resources. If Bhutan aims to

become a superpower through

these developments, we must

confront tough questions about

missing elements in our water

management strategy. The

process should begin by ask

-

ing a simple yet vital principle:

where does our water origi

-

nate? Answering this will help

identify the most effective ways

to manage our water sources.

In the face of extreme

climate events, adapting to

periods of excess water also

presents a serious challenge

for Bhutan’s water resource

management. According to

the IPCC (2013), rising global

temperatures are predicted to

destabilise the Himalayan re

-

gion by accelerating glacier re

-

treat and thawing permafrost.

This will contribute to more fre

-

quent landslides and rockfalls,

while increased precipitation

is expected to intensify runoff

and shorten the gap between

extreme flooding events in the

Ganga and Brahmaputra ba

-

sins including all river systems

in Bhutan. These changes not

only heighten the immediate

risk of disasters such as Glacial

Lake Outburst Floods but also

create long-term instability in

Where does our water come from?

water availability for communi

-

ties across the region.

While rain, ice, and snow

are key drivers of river flow in

the Himalayas—sustaining

agriculture, hydropower, and

ecosystems—our knowledge of

how these elements contribute

and vary over time remains lim

-

ited. The region’s remoteness,

restricted data sharing between

countries, and insufficient un

-

derstanding of water storage in

steep landscapes hinder pro

-

gress. As highlighted by Panwar

(2020), a lack of long-term local

data further complicates reli

-

able predictions about recharge

and water quality. Therefore, it

is crucial for Bhutan to prioritise

closing these data gaps within

available resources to support

effective water management.

Currently in Bhutan, a

springshed management con

-

cept seems to be taken up as a

‘silver bullet’ to mitigate dr y

-

ing water sources which were

mostly the spring water. Numer

-

ous sites across Bhutan were

being identified as ‘recharge

zones’, digging up trenches

(infiltration pits) with the hope

that all the water collected in

those pits will feed into their

streams/springs thus reviving

the water sources. Further, too

many shallow freshwater ‘lakes’

are also being revived from ‘dry

-

ing’ mainly through removing

weed growth and sediment de

-

posits without much attention

to overall catchment dynamics

and almost limited scientific

evidence on how those lakes are

linked with subsurface flows.

A specialist hydrologist is not

required to connect water pock

-

ets in the catchment. What’s

needed is clear technical guid

-

ance and dedicated stakeholder

commitment to monitor water

levels, quality, and ecology over

few year years, enabling more

informed decisions. An easy

way to collect data for such

water source management can

include: (1) gauging surface

water level or bore water level,

(2) soil logs or test pits, (3) site

environmental history, (4) pre

-

cipitation records, (5) monitor

stress indicators in those catch

-

ments, and (6) any change in

catchment that is impacting

various components of site’s

water balance. In summary as

Panwar (2020) proposed the

development and management

plan for springs and streams in

the Himalayas should include

the following prerequisites:

(i) quantification of recharge

and discharge parameters, (ii)

quantification of the evolution

of recharge area over time, and

(iii) future predictive modelling

of spring recharge area.

Tshewang (PhD scholar at

Edith Cowan University) report

-

ed that though the springshed

development approach has

proven to be promising to reju

-

venate springs in some Hima

-

layan catchments, the major

challenge lies in the accurate

identification of the recharge

areas. Due to the complexity

of mountainous terrain, par

-

ticularly, the groundwater flow

system feeding springs is poorly

understood, which makes the

springshed approach difficult

to scale up over larger areas.

Thus, information on water

sources of spring flow (such as

groundwater, snowmelt, rain

-

water and soil water) and their

pathways (local or regional) is

urgently needed for an in-depth

understanding of inner working

of mountain aquifers system.

Tshewang and his team

has applied the latest hydro

-

geochemical techniques in

2023-2024 to investigate springs

and other source waters at vari

-

ous elevations at Yude Ri and

Dungju Ri catchments, under

Trashigang. In such hydro

-

logical research, tracers act like

‘scientific breadcrumbs’ that

allow researchers to track the

invisible journey of water as it

moves through the environ

-

ment. These markers can be

natural tracers, such as unique

‘fingerprints’ of oxygen and hy

-

drogen atoms already found in

rain or snow, or artificial tracers,

like safe, bright fluorescent dyes

injected directly into the ground

to see where they re-emerge. By

measuring these substances in

mountain springs or rivers, sci

-

entists can pinpoint whether

the water originally came from

melting glaciers, seasonal

snow, or deep underground

reservoirs. They also use these

tools to calculate ‘water age’

determining how many years

or even decades the water has

been stored in the mountain’s

rocky interior before reach

-

ing a community’s tap. Such

“detective work” is essential

for managing water resources,

especially in regions like the

Himalayas where understand

-

ing how different sources mix

is the only way to predict future

water availability.

 The results from the study

by Tshewang’s team pointed

out that Spring flows primar

-

ily relied on precipitation (ap

-

proximately 70 percentage

from both direct precipitation

and soil water), making them

very sensitive to changes in

precipitation. Significant contri

-

butions of shallow groundwater

also indicated the vulnerabil

-

ity of spring flows to decreased

snowfall relative to rainfall and

the earlier onset of snowmelt,

particularly for those located in

the snow-rain transition zone

(~2500 m). Such studies indi

-

cate that Bhutan priority should

be to capture as much as pos

-

sible the water that come in the

form of precipitation. Numer

-

ous examples including nature-

based solutions and engineered

storage could be a short-term to

long-term solutions but in long-

term exploring more resilient

mitigation options are critical

to ensure water security.

Nevertheless, the main

takeaway from this article is

that every solution should rely

on data gathered through scien

-

tific methods. The research by

Tshewang and team is just one

example; similar hydrogeologi

-

cal studies need to be the basis

of decision making in terms of

water management for all types

of water resources explorations

which in long-term can be

costly to mitigate errors. Some

key examples of effective water

resource management can ad

-

dress challenges and opportu

-

nities related to:

(1) Springshed manage

-

ment without proper robust

data on linkage with recharge

zone and the discharge zone.

Proper identification of the re

-

charge areas is crucial for the

protection and implementa

-

tion of springshed develop

-

ment strategies. Just assum

-

ing headwater regions acting

as a recharging area in highly

diverse geological setting like

Bhutan Himalayas makes suc

-

cess rate of reviving drying

streams very challenging,

(2) Extraction of groundwa

-

ter sources with limited hydro

-

geological information. Where

does the bore draw water from

and what are risks and oppor

-

tunities? Damage and risk of

contamination to groundwater

can be costly and near impos

-

sible to remediate any dam

-

age. Or worse, what happens

if we have been draining too

much water and suddenly the

systems the aquifer is exposed

to air which they would trigger

complex chemical reactions

which often leads to increasing

water acidity and then leaching

toxic heavy metals (example

Arsenic) which are common

issues in Indian plains neigh

-

bouring Bhutan foothills. For

instance, what groundwater

management plan has been

implemented for the newly es

-

tablished production wells in

-

stalled a year ago in the centre

of the Samtse industrial zone?

and,

(3) Sustainability of numer

-

ous mini-hydro power plants

planned based on limited hy

-

drogeological data or how do

we mitigate hydrological risk

to hydropower stations - as

limitations was laid bare from

major risk of floods to hydro

-

power dams in 2025. Similarly,

when developing key infra

-

structure near major bodies of

water, it is essential to conduct

thorough health and safety

risk assessments, particularly

hydrogeological studies. This

approach could help reduce

the number of bridges that are

overrun by rising rivers during

every monsoon season!

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page